Prior to 2018, the journal was only included in the following academic rankings: FNEGE (rank 4), HCERES (rank C). Thanks to the progress made since, RIPCO has also been ranked by CNRS (version 5.07/June 2020) at rank 4, in the category "International Strategy and Management, Organizational Theory". This new ranking can be interpreted as recognition of the efforts made and the quality of the work done by all involved in the journal.
Abstacting and Indexing
RIPCO is accessible through several packages of the ProQuest aggregator: ProQuest Sociology Database, Social Science Database, Social Science Premium Collection.
RIPCO's full texts and abstacts published since 2001 are available on Cairn, the reference portal for humanities and social science publications.
Click here to visit abstracts and full texts in French
Since April 2021, RIPCO is also present on Cairn international. In a move to increase visibility, English versions of all published articles are being put online progressively, in line with RIPCO’s internationalization strategy.
Click here to access Cairn International Ripco abstracting in English
Click here to access Cairn International Ripco full texts in English
Since 2018, Ripco's bilingual site, which has offered all the information necessary for the publication and dissemination of bibiographical data in French and English since the journal's création in 1994, has become the most important vehicle for dissemination and communication with the scientific community. In the last 12 months, for example, the site received 960,860 visits that consulted 3,849,529 pages (an average of 4 pages per visit) thanks to 4,159,921 hits.
In order to anticipate the future requirements of management science journal rankings, in particular those of FNEGE, a request for integration into the SCOPUS bibliographic database (Elsevier) has been made.
Special Issue: Vol.XXVIII, Num. CFP_SI_OBS ( 2022)
Positive Organizational Scholarship: Between Tradition and Innovation
Guest editors: Equipe éditoriale Ripco
This special issue is devoted to positive organizational behavior scholarship (POS). The proposed papers can be situated at the different traditional levels of analysis of the field of organizational behavior: individuals, groups, organizations, as well as in the links within and between these different levels. The submission of theoretical and empirical papers is acceptable. Given the diverse nature of OB research, both quantitative and qualitative work is welcomed. In this respect, the following research questions are of interest to management sciences: What are the boundaries of the « positive » organizational behavior scholarship? What are the existing differences and overlap between OB’s traditional concepts and those who appear more innovative? How should we measure novel concepts su ...
Special Issue: Vol.XVIII, Num. CFP_SI_SPACEOB ( 2022)
Spaces and Organisation Behaviour: new organisations, new theorisations
Studies on the relationships between spaces and organisational behaviour have recently become richer, considering, for example, materiality, identity, aesthetics, control, reciprocal constitution – up to what is called a turn towards spatiality. However, today, on the one hand, spaces, places and borders are being drastically redefined (e.g. with flex-office, aesthetisation, third places, migrations, multiple reterritorialisations) and on the other hand, the theorisations of organisational space are convening new authors and new concepts (e.g. spacing, throwntogetherness, dispositif, geophilosophy...). In this special issue we propose to follow Beyes & Holt's (2020) invitation to take space seriously and to think spatially: to recognise that all organisations and actors are emplaced or des ...
Special Issue: Vol.XXVIII, Num. CFP_SI_TELETRAVAIL ( 2022)
From telework to hybridity: a new way of thinking about our organizations?
All around the world, the Covid-19 health crisis has forced companies to reorganize work abruptly, quickly and deeply, and telework has become a systematic work modality for many employees in a few days. This increase in telework is likely to continue. Indeed, if telework is a suitable answer to confinement and crisis situations, it also answers other demands of our society, such as the will to reduce real estate costs for companies, the ecological and economical wish to reduce travels, or the expectations of employees in terms of life balance and autonomy. This evolution is underway, but it is not without profoundly changing the way we work, both individually and collectively. This special issue aims at answering the different empirical and theoretical questions that arise around the capa ...
